|
GT2, GT3, RS and Cup Car Discussions Discussions on all topics related to all Porsche GT vehicles |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Re: MovIt Carbon Silicon Carbide Rotors as PCCB Replacement?
Can someone provide a ballpark price for a set? Or is that some kind of secret?
Was this evaluation set provided to you at no cost or reduced cost? Since the factory PCCB discs seem to hold up OK until 10 or 15 track days, I'd say that the jury is still out on the longevity of these. I will certainly watch closely and hope the claims prove to be true. I don't understand why a billet caliper would prevent tappered pad wear. Can you provide more info? |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Re: MovIt Carbon Silicon Carbide Rotors as PCCB Replacement?
Quote:
The pictured discs were provided to me not for evaluation purposes (however I used the opportunity to make that my personal mission ) but as a "loaner" set of friction discs because my full system (I paid full price) was much delayed due to a variety of reasons. I thought it was a strong customer service gesture for them to do that. When my full system arrives, then it's my option to return or buy these loaners. Based on my experience with the now dead PCCB discs (pics somewhere online but I will post them again to this thread) on my Spyder and GT3RS there is no doubt whatsoever in my mind the Movit discs are proving to be light-years ahead in wear characteristics under track use condition. There are a wide variety of posts, over the years, on RL and 6Speed (easily searchable) regarding the tapered pad wear issue. General consensus is that the caliper is not rigid enough and flexes under track use conditions. According to MovIt literature: "MOVIT calipers with its 6-piston BILLET design, have bigger pistons (13 sets of custom designed configurations based on application), longer pads (108 cm²), are BILLET CNC machined from the highest strength 7075 aluminum and are T6 heat treated. The caliper is much stronger than others and will not loose its strength even under high temperatures like cast calipers. The aluminum which is used in cast calipers (alsi5 or alsi7) has a strength factor of approximately 31,915.4-34,816.8 PSI. With an additional heat treatment this strength can be raised to approximately 42,070.3 PSI. The reason why most manufacturers use heat treated aluminum is simply the price. The material used for each "MOV’IT BILLET-CALIPER" has a strength factor of approximately 79,788.5- 82,689.9 PSI. So, the possibility to expand under growing pressure and heat is totally eliminated. CNC machined calipers need less space than cast calipers that can be used with a bigger disc under the same rim then the cast calipers. The material and the extremely strong and "wide" design of the "MOV’IT BILLET-Calipers" means the pressure to the pad is applied evenly even under extreme pressure, greater then 21,754.5 PSI. The heat is transferred to the maximum possible surface area, the temperature stays lower and the durability of all parts is higher. Cast calipers do not compress the pads evenly to the rotor when they expand under higher pressure or temperature. So, the rotor is not evenly heated and the pads wear faster and unevenly. A loss of the already lower braking force of cast calipers" I do have a full MovIt system on my Spyder now since December: http://forums.rennlist.com/rennforum...-insanity.html which I paid full price for. After approx 7 hours of tracking, it is proof to me that MovIt offers a high-priced but even more high-value solution to those of us seeking a "lifetime" brake system for which we don't have to buy rotors ever again or flip pads after every 2 track days. There is no noticeable pad wear nor is the paint on the pads even discolored! (pics attached) That performance is hard to argue with. It won't be a solution for everyone, or even most, as the value proposition can be a challenge to wrap one's head around. But it is there and it is quite compelling for those who have researched the current OE and aftermarket offerings and found them unsatisfying. Folks who have read me over the years on RL/6Speed/TeamSpeed/RennTeam 2.0, and know me in person are aware I am an early adopter, and experiment with outside the box solutions. And then I post what my experiences are. Some are good, some not so much. To those who are not aware of my background and history might think I am a guerrilla marketer, but the truth is I am a "free-marketer" and a manufacturers greatest advocate or worst enemy. My efforts (100% voluntary and unpaid) on building gt2gt3cup.org are recent proof of that claim Your questions are good and appropriate and if I can expand on anything I am happy to do so, just ask! Spyder w/MovIt full system: Seven hours of hard track time. No pad discoloration, rotors look new, no noticeable pad wear. Last edited by Trackrat; 07-07-2011 at 01:34 PM. Reason: correct Spyder brake install date |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Re: MovIt Carbon Silicon Carbide Rotors as PCCB Replacement?
Good stuff. I don't mean to accuse you of 'guerrilla marketing'. I just want to understand all the dynamics.
I'm not sure I totally buy the whole theory on tapered pad wear. If it were caused by a structural weakness in the caliper and it flexing, wouldn't the pads wear in a curve, less wear in the middle of the pad, more on each end where the caliper is clearly stronger because that's where the front and back are connected? I would expect tapered wear on any large surface area brake pad that is mounted in a multi piston caliper. On any brake pad, there is going to be a certain amount of torque applied to the pad during braking. What will a motorcycle do if it brakes too hard? It will flip forward because of that torque. That torque is normal. When we have a multi piston caliper, like the 6 piston units on your car, the pistons can move independently from one another, which allows the torque to turn the pad over time and wear the pad unevenly. Now the best way to compensate for this is to stagger the piston size with smaller pistons close to the leading edge and larger pistons closer to the trailing edge. I know Porsche does this on my 4 piston unit, I'm guessing they do the same on the 6 piston unit. But apparently they haven't staggered the sizes enough. If the MovIt calipers stagger the pistons differently, this may have an effect on the tapered pad wear. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Re: MovIt Carbon Silicon Carbide Rotors as PCCB Replacement?
Quote:
http://soar.wichita.edu/dspace/bitst...pdf?sequence=1 I find Pete's adventures in testing "stuff" to satisfy his curiosity quite interesting, I really appreciate you taking the leading on finding and using these rare products Pete, thanks
__________________
Fatih Selekler 997.2 GT3 Last edited by FTS; 07-07-2011 at 11:57 PM. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Re: MovIt Carbon Silicon Carbide Rotors as PCCB Replacement?
Quote:
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Re: MovIt Carbon Silicon Carbide Rotors as PCCB Replacement?
Quote:
__________________
Mike - lowly 2012 Carrera GTS - Honorary GT3 Forum Member |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: MovIt Carbon Silicon Carbide Rotors as PCCB Replacement?
FWIW, an observation on pad tapering - when I use Pagid RS29s on my steel brake GT3.1, they will taper every time. I once switched to Pagid Blacks, which destroyed the stock rotors (rings of Saturn big time) but no taper wear at all. I have no idea why this should be.
|
|
|